[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6629432 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1681095038799488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6629432

>400 replies
>74 IPs
Can we rangeban AI trannies already
Do your fucking job, jannies

>> No.6609248 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1681095038799488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609248

>>6609241
based
>>6609244
m-maybe not now... but its le improving every week!!

>> No.6601262 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601262

>>6601248
>full fucking retard
so you deny that this is the case. PROOFS? how can you use the keywords of something which was not visually represented before. how would AI come up with the concept of an eastern dragon, assuming an eastern dragon was never drawn before by a human? if you wrote in "eastern dragon" in Shitjourney, and it had no samples to visually reproduce something like that, what would the result be? probably a western dragon in front of some Japanese buildings, because AI has no nuance as it's not an actual being. if you're gonna say "do your own research" again, you should opt in for sexual reassignment surgery, it would fit your female brain

>> No.6264413 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6264413

>>6264407
>nice argument as expected from a sub 50 iq artist
I'm not an artist but keep calling me that lmao. I wish I were, it would definitely put me a step above you
>if you weren't so angry you would have made a better projection but no, i don't think anyone who claims themselves to be artists have any talent whatsoever
true, because "talent" doesn't exist. but again, it's normgroids like you who push for AI to believe that. they think themselves as "creative" but don't have any "art gifts". you're just a confused soulless bugman
>that's because science has been used as a tool for political clout, but when you get down to technicalities science requires intelligence and competency, a far cry from art
KEK, imagine unironically believing this. holy shit, you really are retarded. most science isn't needed, and a lot of scientists are fucking retards. it's a skill like any other, and having a skill doesn't automatically make you "intelligent". why don't you tell me what your job is instead, and I can share you mine afterwards :). I want to know with what kind of "intelligent" being I'm speaking with

>> No.6262504 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6262504

>>6262470
>so i would say that's more than enough respect
lmao. pissing in spaghetti cans won competitions. once again, /g/tard thinks he knows shit about art, what's relevant and what isn't in it

>> No.6219134 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6219134

>>6219130
you should kill yourself either way, you cockroach. what are you doing on this board if you're only interested in AI shit?
>>>/g/

>> No.6213382 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6213382

>>6213335
>This thread has giving me an epiphany: art as a clientele based career may have been usurped, but art as an original idea-based career is far from gone. At the end of the day, an experienced artist with skill can TRULY create from the heart, while the laymen will feed off whatever the machine gives. If the layman wants a green orangutan on a beach, the machine will give him 5-6 iterations. And the person will thus reiterate untill satisfied. The experienced artist will jot down from the very beginning exactly how they want it. The human artist knows what they want directly, while the layman will get what they want "which is good enough".
yeah I mean i've honestly realized this from the start. it's also why I firmly do not believe that we will ever be replaced as humans (not just as artists) until artificial general intelligence is invented. that is, actual robots with human intelligence and judgment as capabilities at the very least. and honestly that's nowhere close for it to happen and it wouldn't matter anyway since that would basically mean the apocalypse and I'd probably kill myself preemptively

>> No.6178527 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6178527

>>6178512
>everything you say is bad because i made up an image of you in my mind and you're probably baitingtrolling so whatever you say is doublevoid haha gottem lol lmao
that's what you did, you onions chugging bugman. seems you don't like the pansy can dish it out but can't take it.
>Time will prove me right. Always did, always will
this is the retard who complains about artists being "arrogant". you're nothing.
>Of course, when the times comes to eat your words, you will just feign ignorance, because that's the type of niggers you are.
Yeah, I've been told the same with my job becoming "automated" 7 years ago, yet I still have it and its automation is nowhere in sight. or same with vehicles. if anything, time proved me right so eat shit

>> No.6143196 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6143196

>all this STEM shilling
I went to study CS because of the "just become a programmer bro" mentality. wasted 4 years of my fucking life, it was awful. i wish I would've used those years to draw instead.

>> No.6125805 [View]
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1654851725508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6125805

>>6125795
yes yes, AI this AI that. AI will even learn to shit itself and suck its own dick one day. what do you want me to do retard, do nothing but consooooom all day or become a soulless STEMcuck?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]