/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3799983
ban?

>>3745118

>>3732646
>oh, fuck off.. You came in here thinking you could "what even is [insert concept]??" to everything
You kind of can tho. what even is art?
> but I gave you a solid definition that has answered every fucking question you've asked since.
So ALL communication is art? You haven't answered a single flipping question.
>read it and find the fucking answers yourself idiot.
I'm axing you tho. You said it. why do you refuse to elaborate or esplore these memes?
>this is what I'm talking about. literal retardation.
endless ad hominem shit, zero argument.
> I gave you a definition, you asked me if trash is art, I said "art is communication" implying your example lacked that part of the definition
But then I axed about what the existence of trash says about a setting, what is being communicated by the type of trash, the art on the trash itself, the intent behind the portrayal of trash, etc.
>but you take that as "art is ONLY communication" and start talking about fucking radios is art
So radio broadcasting isn't art? Is coding art?

What isn't art?

>>3721344
this is another that was an afterbirth dump that I stopped production on because I thought it looked neat. Thought of it as a squeakquel to >>3721339 and sister meme of >>3721128

>>3717232
>summarizing: everything about this conceptual piece of a painting is consistent with the intentions
bunch of retroactive justification for a piece of trash lmao no fundamentals git gud faget
>any painting is a commonplace that calls for debate and weighing one opinion up with another, as well as taste. but it can be stated that Tuymans was pretty clear about what he was getting at.
or it looks like he suxxxed cox and dix at drawing and made up a bunch of scuses
>What are you getting at, Jimmy?
regarding what? You're comparing hundreds of paintings connected to dozens of different ideas and concepts I've been thinking and writing about for years. Like I have an idea for an episode of a comedy series about meme paintings called "How to Paint Entropy," and you're drawing parallels between my goofsklovn memeschlock and fucking gas chamber paintings? Por que?
>How does it show in your paintings? Like, literally point out to us where the "wabi sabi" is in one of your paintings.
I'd say one of the first ones where I really got excited about thinking about wabi sabi and how to make it part of your approach to creative production happened on >>3717292 where i accidentally put a white streak on the bottom corner, but I liked how it looked like she was cringing about it, and then it looked like Blue Green and Red Lawrence were reacting to it, and it just led into a lot of reflecting and reading about and writing about wabi sabi as a way to let things be left undone to potentially be continued later, or letting accidents or mistakes loiter and reflecting on them to see if there's anything to learn from it or ways to build on the mistake in the future etc.
>Where is that beloved entropy concept of yours?
Like this is one concept out of at least 40. Time is entropy is a big concept to talk about but it's not necessarily "beloved." It just is. Why are you so upset about entropy? Entropy is evident in all of it!

>>3693126
>The fact that you think the anatomy is shit shows you have no idea about anything related to anatomy.
It was clearly a goof. It's a non-sequitor crit with no relevancy to the work itself. Like "symbol drawing."
>Also animating with a tablet is already hard.
and acrylic portraiture is a piece of cake.
>A mouse is pretty fucking impressive.
edit+undo isn't.
>Either way, expecting someone to aim for realistic anatomy while they use a mouse is hilarious
all these excuses for terrible anatomy
>and points directly to the knowledge you don't have about anything related to it.
wow it's almost like it's annoying when someone gives a meaningless critique from ignorance about something you spend a lot of time doing or something.

>>3610602
all these are dope but this one is kino

>>3603253
> But after seeing you pop up all over the place and seeing how you speak to people makes my image of you became incredibly obnoxious and toxic.
yeah that's kind of the premise. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMOvfSyKRH8
>The point of this board is for I or anyone to post art and to be told how shit it is.
And my schtick is that I subvert that through self-destruction and yelling some hysterical humanistic aburdism memes and stuff. Sorry ur upset.
>If you really didn't care so much then ignore everyone yeah?
That's the spoof of the autoresponse (you) bot meme. Like it's using my impuslive, ocd tendencies to force me to interact with EVERY fucking amount of feedback. Like how tourrettes works or whatever. The goal wasn't to come out of this with positive TOM.
>It's an anonymous board? You can just scroll past.
That's the novely lolol.
>. The fact you need to reply to everyone clearly shows you got a defence mechanism
Of course. It was an impulse I felt and was embarrassed by the first times I tried posting here. Then, like everything, I leaned into, and built a schedule around it. See what happens.
>and maybe something internal affecting your confidence or self image or whatever cause you're hurt
My dad was a bad person. He killed my father figures. I have a lot of guilt because I didn't kill him when he dared me to. I want people to do better for the good of humanity.
>something is stopping you and you need to look at it and stop directing it outwards at anonymous internet users.
I'm the one eating shit here. I'm talking to (you). Not you. I don't know anything about anyone here than what they reveal in their written text.
>(You can go ahead and take every bullet point of this point and give some kind of rhetoric
I have pretty extreme attention deficit disorder. It's the only way I thoroughly encode criticism. I was conditioned that you argue to learn. I think in a dialogue and (you) help me clarify my instincts. Nothing personell.

>>3585995
I'm gonna do this but I'm gonna do it on a graphite transfer. Idk what kind of savant can pull that shit off on a blank dang canvas

>>3558595
>Serious question what planet are you from?
It's this little planet called Da Screets Miugga in the gedrekt yadoobus galaxy.

alright I'm probably done. You can go back to enjoying your self-important incestuous hivemind of boring trash. see you in a few weeks maybe when you all need to tell yourselves how special you think you are in my next sludge dump.

>>3507830
>OP last time you made this thread I was blown away.
dope
>You're sick in the head.
yeah exactly that can be part of the marketing or whatever.
>Take your fucking time for once and work towards something
Well I'm sick of having the long beard and hair and I can't shave that off until I do the Potato Eaters/Alien painting and I'm still like 20 away from that so eh.

Stop procrastinating and just make stuff, dork.
>You're like the human embodiment of the concept of accelerationism in the modern age
YES EXACTLY
>in a really bad way.
tell that to ur mum u hoser
>You wanting to cut your finger off because its an obsession is like the cherry on top man
Thanks I think so too!
>If you need to hinder your ability to live a normal life for the sake of a "conversational piece" you are probably the least interesting person alive.
How does the lack of one knuckle from the ring finger "hinder your ability to live a normal life?"

Also, the ocd and bipolar adhd and narcissism is probably what is preventing me from doing a "normal life" meme. I only get one of these fuckers.
>for the sake of a "conversational piece" you are probably the least interesting person alive.
why? I'm gonna eat it too you know. So I can have a conversation piece about cannibalism while I'm at it.

Also I legitimately want an android finger. Also I'm fascinated by nerve damage and phantom pain and stuff and I believe that traumatic stress can be fun!
>I know none of this will get through to you and you'll just keep on doing this because you're too far gone but I just wanted to let you know.
'preash