/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5024522
I watched this .gif endlessly trying to figure out how he did it (brushes and process), and i'm still tentative about trying it out for myself. Is it just like OP's picture or >>5024537?

the videos are interesting. i wish there was commentary though

>>4075166
stop being a cumbrain

i personally have an 8" wang when fully erect and i realized lately my boners have been around 6" because I'm not even that aroused and I don't enjoy it that much. when I'm diamonds I can't think straight and I see stars.

I haven't had a decent fuck in over a year, and I've been an almost daily masturbator since I was 14, I'm 24 now. 10 years of cumbrains has fucked me up.

It's easy not to fap when you just decide to really not to. i get urges and impulses, i fucking love to draw my own porn, curtailed to my liking. but you know what? I'd rather rawdog the cute 5'1" cashier at the cornerstore, push her knees up over her head and watch her eyes roll back as i pound into her tight vagoober. I haven't had that in a while, and that's 1000x better than any greasy fap session.

drawing and fapping takes a good 2 hours of my day that i could be using for exercise or drawing, which would make my life better in the long run

pic unrelated

"Soul" is just mistakes, weird proportions, sloppy construction work, and compositional heavy-handedness, often in conjunction with symbol drawing on a framework of instantly stimulating fundamental elements such as bright color/basic color palette, high contrast, overly busy repetetive detailing or effects, and emotionally evocative subject matter.

So-called "Soulless" art is created when an artist strives for technical excellence but falls short in a way that is contrasted and highlighted against the more successfully executed elements present in the work.

How do you manage to maintain the position that you believe art has soul while simultaneously acting in a way which is violently vitriolic towards any artist that strays away from technical and stylistic uniformity? Is it not hypocritical to refuse allowances for emotionally evocative/stylistic art that doesnt fit your preconception of appeal while praising a piece that fits all criteria aside from those which infuse it with the less beautiful interpretations of existence?

>>4015876
thanks this is pretty nice

this ambient occlusion technique. paid for the process vid... last time i'll pay for something without commentary

a gif from his patreon on his process in case anyone wanted to see

>>3304248
thanks man. he included a pretty nifty process gif. worth the additional dl just for that.