/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4185390
i dont have anything really negative to say about any of them because they're all better than me

>oneironaut
he seems to be pretty much there, its hard to tell since most of what i can recognize seems to be refs/studies so im not sure which are originals.
i do wish that he'd try drawing things other than anime characters (especially backgrounds) or experimenting w/ studies of some artists i consider more interesting, but ultimately it's his choice (im a stickler for big visual libraries)

>mathias
wouldn't be out of place on the artstation front page. i think he could show more sort of landscape stuff or integrated narratives (he did do one on the 9th). he's already demonstrated technical skill, great expression/characterization, and the ability to dig deep for inspiration to create something interesting and new (like his scarecrow mask on the 21st)

>j
puts in an insane amount of volume into his work, has great kinetic energy in his linework, and seems like he enjoys the process immensely. would definitely not be pleased if i ever found myself as good as him someday.

>tang
hes got amazing use of line weight and hatching, i dont always love how the proportions come out (ive always had mixed opinions on Jamie Hewlett sort of Gorillaz/TankGIrl like art...) it takes a lot of skill to make a style like this work at higher levels of detail and still read very well, especially in landscapes (see oct 14.) so i respect it immensely though

>lazypotato
hes got his rendering down pat, and i always love animal drawings so he's in my good books. (oct 18, 19) are also interesting w/ 2-tone ink landscapes

>nessie
i like his stuff, its real cute. don't beat yourself up too much. i have a whole list of my favorite cute artists id love to send you, but at least take a peek at @rei_17, @chibiss_i, @kokaki mumose, @no33no. i hope you find something you find neat enough to try in your own art.

>>4185380
>>4185398
no comment.