/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5092699
I'm limited by my own lack of perspective knowledge, but maybe this might help. The angle of the reference is different to what you have in your picture, it's very close and almost level to the child while your perspective seems to be an odd mix of top-down while still retaining background details.

Overlapping shapes would also help convey depth a bit better - the original clock you had was working with an impossible perspective (get a similarly-shaped object and view it from that angle and you'll see it's almost impossible to see both the back and front planes unless viewing it from a top-down angle).

Hopefully someone with more experience can offer something useful.