/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6430788
>she doesnt
HAHAHAHAHAHA there's no way you're being serious. I could literally make a list, right now, of all that is absolutely wrong in that musculoskeletal structure. And that's just anatomy lol. You know what? Fuck it. From the top:
>Inconsistent face planes. Some of it is shaded as if illuminated from the superior left front, some as if from above, some as if it had a cooler bounce light (weird, since the PINK GLOVE close to the face would bounce back a soft, reddish light from below)
>Pointy chin and non-discernible jawline.
>No digastric, mylohyoid, or sternomastoid muscles spotted.
>Double eyebrows?
>Unclear shape and connection of neck.
>Lateral deltoid doesn't seem connected to acromion process of the scapula, but to go over it and connect somewhere else (???).
>Trapezius entirely missing.
>Anterior deltoid entirely missing.
>Posterior deltoid should be seen fro this angle, assuming the lumbar spine is correct (it isn't though so fuck it).
>Pectoralis major joins in too high into the humerus; arm has no leverage.
>Triceps entirely missing
>Brachialis entirely missing.
>Humerus long as fuck
>Biceps is aight up to where it joins the shoulder. That lump could be a tumor.
>Ulna and olecranon process super low.
> Brachioradialis inserts wrong into forearm.
> Anconeus entirely missing.
> The raised arm forms an impressive TRIPLE TANGENT using the same line from the shirt into the triceps, from the breast into the biceps, and by the fist touching that strand of hair (that thumb is fucked too)
>Unclear termination of ribcage.
>Obliques completely improvised
>Rectus abdominis completely improvised AND lit wrongly, as if pertaining to the lateral plane.
>Erector spinae completely missing.
>Lumbar spine too long (it's only 5 vertebrae from T12 to Sacrum, not a fucking snake).
>Illiac crest completely missing. I concede that the pants could cover it (unlikely cuz of obliques "structure", but let's pretend).

I COULD go on, but holy shit man, study a bit.

>>6397082
>And I notice the anatomy of people around (oh look at that beautiful biceps brachialis or that gluteus maximus)
kek I too look at bodies in a different way after years of live figure drawing
I don't even feel anything sexual anymore its just like hey nice ribs I wanna try drawing that

>>4563525
made my pp hard but I don't want to become a furry

>>4406806
may His light one day lead you out of darkness.

no, really.

>>3921862
sounds like somebody needs to read their Loomis

>>3825835
>not drawing with right hand and funposting with your left hand

>>3730784
don't want to kill that Discord idea, but perhaps you could join us anon?
>>3727571

>>3663540
I meant he gets it as in a LOT of anons on /ic/ don't even think about finishing pieces. That's not how it works. You'll learn a lot more in the making of a finished piece than with the same time spent doing studies, unless you want to be Loomis 2.0.
So yeah, at least for me, I really think doing finished works + using studies and Loomis as a tool when you don't understand something is infinitely better than grinding artbooks and poses for days.

>>3454990
Andrew Loomis is probably one of the best authors of an instruction books to help introduce theories and fundamentals to new artists. He breaks down and illustrates a lot of points necessary for starting off drawing at many stages of developing a skill in the field.
He's surefire one of the best way for a layman to turn into a professional without the help of college or university guidance or peers.
/ic/ have used him as the go-to guide for every beginner on principle that Loomis can more thoroughly explain in his books most pitfalls every artist starting out finds themselves in with a more trusted manner. This has turned into somewhat of a cult for /ic/ and a meme for others, for when so many continue to press the same message on beginners it becomes frustrating to be written off so quickly, and thus many who start off refuse to break down and turn to Fun with a Pencil, Figure Drawing for All It's Worth, Drawing the Head and Hands, and more. Others however, do tend to parrot Loomis without even reading his works, thus compounding some of the newgoers frustrations.
Honestly, he's amazing, and definitely deserves his spot on the sticky, and the memes about him can't do it proper justice without becoming a parody. For better or worse, he's a meme, and while we can't do better for him, that is his most concrete spot in this day and age for exposure.

>>3360000
Praise the word of our lord. Amen.

>>3343369
i'll give you
>>3343095

the other portrait is muddy af, and the other one is just a study

>>3331712
I see it sometimes. This one got less traction despite all the loomisposting.

>>3292880

>>3275022
God doesn't need to go to college duh.

>>3219533
Needs more Loomis

>>3132473
oboi
if you can't even follow the video you gotta go back to loomis

>>3054519
sonny

>>3053614