/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4618939
>it encourages and normalizes the feelings for them so that they’re more likely to seek the real thing.
That is EXACTLY what people said about movies/videogames. They also had the exact same faggot talking point that "it's" different too, except it was in relation to books and other fiction, rather than what you're proposing. What you're saying is something that almost never, if at all, happens, to the point it has no more validity than an argument against videogames. It doesn't MATTER what feelings you think it encourages, that's not your problem to police, you don't get to decide what people think and feel. Should anarchist literature be banned for encouraging anti-social sentiment? Should we ban recipes for unhealthy food, cause let me tell you people are pretty damn weak when it comes to restraining themselves against food. The answer is no, it's always no, no matter what you personally feel about it, because it's not yours or anyone elses decision to decide what other people think. I don't fucking CARE if reading lolicon stimulates those desires and brings them to the front of their mind. That's their fucking problem and rest assured, the FBI is almost certainly watching them to make sure they do not do anything.

Admit it, you fucking lying dishonest faggot, you don't really care about any of your argument and just want some excuse to justify your hatred of lolicon. You must have thought loooooooong and hard to come up with this bullshit.