/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6911433
Ok, this is my magnum opus.

>he reads posts that dont have a hand drawn image attached to them

OH NO NO NO

>>6754612
Of course there are, a man OC self insert has to have sex with the female OC. its pretty standard stuff on the internet.

>>6509477
For the last year on average one a month (some months are dry, and some a guy will come in and buy like 3 pieces), I only got like 600 followers on twitter tho. I feel the people who actually make a living wage are the guys with +10k and are on every platform in existence.

>>6475735
>>6477005
I get the mentality sort of, I don't have a problem with people thinking differently but when they keep clogging up my timeline with their bad opinions and retweets seenign / learning from their art isn't always worth it.

Fucking 5 posts a day about how elon is literally Satan and smug posting how its OVER for him and his company will FAIL. really nice colours but its just not worth it rolling my eyes into the back of my skull that often.

>>6453258
Like a year ago they had a van gogh exhibit but when I showed up they had 0 originals and it was all just his art projected onto a wall. The time before it was at my citys main art museum and I went because they had leonardos actual anatomy works and it was pretty good to see live but 80% of the exhibit after that was "modern art" toilet with pipes through them tier bullshit.

Don't plan to ever go to one again I think.

>>6450167
>>6450162
Opening the floor to any other anons who want to give me a critique. Is this anon right? Should I be going softer? I was getting complaints that most of my twink drawings were just drawing girls and calling them boys so i tried to make them more masculine. But now everyone is telling em to go "softer" but i'm not really sure what that means exactly.

Are those drawings he posted more "appealing" then mine?

>post your work like you usually do in threads
>some dude gives you completely off base advice thats way different then what other artists you know and respect have told you
>be semi reluctant to believe the "advice" but be open minded that maybe this anon is telling what others are too polite ti say
>ask to see their work to make sure this is coming from a person of reasonable skill and not some spiteful angry crab thats just trying to make people feel bad
>instead they get ass blasted and refuse to post their art
>furious that I didn't accept their "cratique" off hand.

ok

>>6398421
tell me what the worst part of this set is, and ill redo it