/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3221160
I will take the HEh pill, it's easy to perceive it as antagonistic since so many things are passively antagonistic for the gentiles (things like replacing European architecture with modern shit in Jew Nest New York, modernism has explicit roots in Jewery feeling uncomfortable in nationalistic gentile cities), and directly antagonistic (dismantling the remnants of "white privilege" and nationalistic pride because muh six million, muh marxism, muh commodification of everything for the free market etc), it's easy to slip into the Sturmerpill. Modern art is a symptom of the very explicitly and provably Jewish vein of cultural marxism, post modernism etc (inb4 /pol/ tier, I understand what these buzzwords actually mean and they are very relevant when discussing contemporary art history and critical theory).
Say what you want but Hitler's cabinet really did hit the nail on the head with the Degenerate Art exhibition and correctly identified that the purpose of a lot of "modern art" during the 1930s, often made by subversive Bolshevik sympathising Weimar Republic Jews, was to critique and attack the German people with the intent of dismantling German identity. The parity between that art exhibition and the work on display at the MoMa for instance is shocking.

Does anyone have tips when it comes to composition?