/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2426291
rs and curators who I meet regularly and boucle ideas off. Sitting in the basement devoid of the human contact is kind of separating honestly. My works have some ties to the local visual artists and their works are starting to reflect aspects of mine. It's nice.

>chaos magic, and I've already discovered new aspects
Modifying your own perceptions has a way of doing this. That's why I find looking at shit in a bog standard design sense sterile. I'm a catholic and in some of my works the symbology is striking, but that might just be the pareidolia talking.

>destroying at least 30 of my painting
Jesus. Elevate those things!

> concern in it's center is to rise above the duality
That's exactly what the Vorticists were about, putting themselves at the point of maximum creative energies. They set up dualistic structures are argued back and forth between them using simplistic arguments to create conflict. Not fighting for either side, but for both/and. This structure allowed violent energetic discourse between the two for them to work with. PM/M, White/Black, Male/Female, Muslim/White, Purple/Yellow, etc. The conflict could be viewed as a Vortex with the Artist constantly navigating their way into the center, the point of maximal energy! There is no purpose to a one-sided art, a Vortex of discourse/conflict cannot exist between it and thus it lacks any energy and becomes dead. The Vorticist allows himself to be on both sides, a mercenary (who is progressing) and transcends the actual argument but enters into a type of transcendence of it. From the centre there is protection and vitriol.