/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3752864
>Post Japanese art you like that's not same generic animu shit
>Posts generic anumu shit

>>2274543
You could make things that a camera would never be able to capture, but again this would mean that you would deviate away from the rules and break them which is something that /ic/ in the regular draw threads deem as taboo and would rather paint fruitbowls.

Today I showed my art teacher what digital art was. He's like 58 or something, always worked in traditional.

I brought my tablet with me to the classes and a usb drive with some of my favorite digital artists' work.

He liked peleng quite a bit. He was at disbelief at first that you could do something like that on a computer.
But he also said that it looked more like illustration than fine art. Needs a wider color palette and variation, etc. And that some of the pictures looked too photographic.

He wasn't particularly impressed with mullins and jaime jones, though. I guess you can't impress a traditional artist with a "painterly" look.

Then I showed him Ruan Jia. At first he was like "hey, that's cool". But I had super-high res pictures of his work, where every brush stroke is visible. So I zoomed in. His mind was blown the fuck out. He was so impressed, he went around showing it to his colleagues and then the students, telling us we should learn this "digital" stuff asap. He even started talking about arranging digital drawing classes somehow.

So I gave him my tablet to try it out and he's been hogging it for the last three days. He sits there doodling away while we work.

How about you, /ic/? What does your art teacher think about digital art?