/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6858571
>If you gave someone one image, and prompted them to draw them from other angles, without reference, they would simply use their imagination and reasoning to try and create a coherent image with the data/image they have before them, because the human possess the innate actual capabilities and critical thinking skill to learn and learn from the mistakes, process information and learn from the information it acquired, while knowing and being aware of what he is doing.
okay, so you didn't understand what i said in that post. try again.
i even went through it step by step for you.
if there is a mistake, point out the specific mistake. i'm not going to bother continuing until you show that you at least understand what i'm saying.

>i already was expecting this exact type of answer.
yes, you clearly expected to know my answer, even though you don't understand it.
and this is exactly why it is frustrating.
like i said, you don't read. you just argue with your own headcanon.

>>6858574
>it just can't spit them back from a different angle or speculate without having been fed data of that specific scenario.
yes.
because it can not make things up from the aether. this is not magic.
and neither can humans. this is just not how information works.

the difference between you and me is that you think that humans can do this. as if we didn't draw everything using prior knowledge or experience.
as if we didn't have to literally study things from multiple angles before being able to draw them.

you think this is all just human creativity. i wonder why :)