/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1734697

>>1680243
Why should I have to name them all? I named enough to inform you that I'm familiar with the concept, which is all that is necessary for this discussion. Furthermore I provided examples from Cezanne's own life and work that support the claim that great work can rely on formal rather than narrative qualities. I could have used any number of artists though. What do Monet's haystacks mean? What story do Pollock's paintings tell?


If you have a counter argument, then let's hear it, otherwise you can cut the red herring bullshit and post in some other thread.

>>1680243
Why should I have to name them all? I named enough to inform you that I'm familiar with the concept, which is all that is necessary for this discussion. Furthermore I provided examples from Cezanne's own life and work that support the claim that great work can rely on formal rather than narrative qualities. I could have used any number of artists though. What do Monet's haystacks mean? What story do Pollock's paintings tell?


If you have an argumen, then let's hear it, otherwise you can cut the red herring bullshit and post in some other thread.