[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.1572503 [View]
File: 92 KB, 679x516, 1213080514771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1572503

>>1572498
>You're not most of the board so you wouldn't know.
Wow, it's not like there were threads about making a sticky and how much people wanted one before there was one or anything.
>the sticky isn't a magic key
No one said it was. This is word twisting at best.
>events of anons emerging with questions that either come from the stick retarding them or just doesn't provide the specific help is testament to how useless the sticky really is.
Most of the people who benefit most from the sticky don't require specific help but general.
>The only one that is doing that is the one who persists that a narrow explanation is a membrane against a "million" "low level" artists scourging you delicate taste and vandalizing /ic/.
No counterpoint; condescension; insults.
>I can't help if I see things for what they really are.
Arrogance.
>It's not my fault the truth about your arrogance shows how degenerative your ideologies are to the whole of /ic/ and Art in general.
Parading opinion as fact; condescension; insults.
>It's not my fault you're so set in your ways you can't even see the forest through the trees. Don't blame me. I'm the only one really helping here.
Condescension; insults.

If you can't even actually form a counterargument then how are we supposed to believe you?

Never mind that if you actually wanted to change the opinion of anyone, you're not going to accomplish it by acting like a smug fuck; that just puts people off and inhibits any sort of openness people might have to your viewpoint. Which in this case, means you are sabotaging yourself.

See that? It's a well reasoned sentence. Pic related; you are at the bottom of the pyramid. This latest post of yours doesn't even rise to the level of contradiction, it's all ad hominem - attacking the person, not the substance of their argument.

I have helpfully noted the problems with your post in the event you should like to adjust your posts to be better received.

>> No.1459303 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 92 KB, 679x516, 1213080514771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459303

>>1459301
Oh, and while we're on the subject again, this continues to be a complete irrelevant line of reasoning meant only to deflect from your own inadequacy. See; Ad Hominem. That's you right now.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]