/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6887543
>So I dont understand why you paint it as a bad thing.
When you see the word tick tock or the word nignog, you don't need to know what an ablaut duplication is in order to create* the sentence "I am tired of all this AI slipslop and the pooloos constantly dumpbumping it".

In fact, if you know the rules of ablaut duplication, you can only produce slipslop, as pooloos and dumpbump follow different rules of reduplication (rhyming/consonantal swappping in this case).

*Anyone with any command on English can create a pattern like this on the fly, given the correct context.
I had to give you an example sentence, and that's why I put an asterisk. I was consciously using the rule, instead of simply knowing English and using whatever tools are appropriate for a sentence, and because of that it took me a good while to come up with some decent example.

As I wrote "swapping", THEN it occurred to me naturally: I could have written swipswapping here!

In short, there is nothing bad with knowing these rules and analyzing stuff, but by thinking you should follow all these random Gestalt principles when doing your art, you will be crippling yourself.
You can learn all the grammar you want in a language, but you'll only get a feeling for it once you start to actually listen to it and reproduce what you've heard from others who are natives.

Such principles should be used as "tie-breakers" or in very specific points. You drew something using your intuition and something is not working well:
>Why is it? Are there any tangents in my drawing? - Oh, here it is! Let me work around it.
Now you're using rules in a non-bad way.

Didn't read, who cares.

Does anyone know where I can download all of his art posts? Because it's over a thousand posts and all on Instagram, it's basically impossible to save it, even if I try manually; Instagram just IP bans you if you try to use a downloader or even if you manually go over too many posts, at some point you get denied loading.

Thanks.

THERE ARE ONLY TWO ARTSTYLES:

SOVL and SOVLLESS

Anything else is globohomo propaganda.

I don't know, OP.
Why am I not wearing panties and posting pictures of my manly, shaved ass online for old men to throw money my way?

>>6564662
Is that your art?
It's not pretty, but it's well-rounded, it has a personality.

I can only fap to videos or my own imagination, static pictures are too boring.
Maybe in a few years AI can provide me with something that moves in a non-uncanny way.

>>6085401
No need to get this upset over someone else's conviction just because you have none.

>>6085415
>rebellious
Being a pornographer is celebrated by the leftists. Even if there is a slice of the porn pie that gets shunned for being le based and le redpilled as you say, you are still engaging in a market of dopamine-enslaved hedonistic people.
It's like me saying nigger music is degenerate and you retorting with "haha! nothing makes blacks seethe more than a white man rapping!", completely missing the point that it is an unhealthy craft in the first place.

I am 100% against censorship, by the way, I'm simply stating porn isn't art. Keep making it all you want.

What, do you think a musician can never play another person's songs?
A musician should only ever compose his own songs and never attempt to learn pre-existing ones?

When you listen to people speak your language, do you tell them how boring it is that they learned normal words and speak other people's dialects/accents, instead of coming up with "there" own original words, like you?

Do you think someone who has never used GOOD ART to learn is going to be able to produce GOOD ART?

No, niggerlover. It will MAYBE look original, but it will be utter shit. You have to learn what you like in design before consolidating it into something people would like to see.