/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5225826
they seem pretty fair to me
unless the illustrations unique or have some sort of story, why would you overpay for something you could learn in a few years?

>>5223605
>>5223618
i usually draw with my sketchbook on my penis
is what this anon said is true?
is there some emission coming from the tablet that will fry my sperm?
i want to have art babies one day

>>5219610
>Their methods could not exist without Loomis.
The fucking ignorance in this thread.
And how did the masters learn to draw heads from imagination?
Did they have Loomis?
This is completely retarded.
Regardless, just because they mention Loomis doesn't mean you should study it.

Literally every artist mentions Michelangelo but NOONE here says to study him. I wonder why...
We should just replace "Loomis" with "Michelangelo" if we're going to go with that logic.

>>5196305
i've learned this as well too
i had a period of my life where i drew for 10 hours straight every single day taking only very short breaks and not eating much because i heard from some asshole YouTube artist (FengZoo or some shit) that you had to draw for 12-16 hours a day to get good at drawing

honestly, fuck that guy
most artists don't even draw that long, especially ones that people like me would consider to be good
being "good" isn't pro level, being "good" is being able to execute what you want without having to be restricted by anything other than what you allow (i.e. not being restricted because you can't draw a face for instance)

made me despise artists to be honest

Bored in class and I drew this today. What do you guys think lol