[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.4948185 [View]
File: 72 KB, 960x654, EZsIl_-UcAQK_rB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4948185

>>4948090

i can absolutely guarantee that this is just a marketing tactic, and it works given how popular their page is. The one creating the art is likely an older sibling, i respect the hustle, and if you're buying into this kid actually creating this art, you're a brainlet

>> No.4762375 [View]
File: 72 KB, 960x654, C1B99F96-5905-492E-B910-20DC32CD0282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4762375

>>4762356
>constructive racism

>> No.4718995 [View]
File: 72 KB, 960x654, C18C6DFE-5110-4C5C-BA4E-6ED944E69B44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4718995

>>4718994

>> No.4714859 [View]
File: 72 KB, 960x654, EZsIl_-UcAQK_rB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4714859

something i don't see emphasised enough is copying other artists in order to learn and see where you're going wrong in your own work / studies. I see a lot of emphasis on master painting studies, but barely ever in regards to line drawing, character design, stylisation etc.

my personal observation of an extremely fast way to improve is:

1- copy art that you like
2- attempt to create drawings of similar qualities to what you were copying
3- look at the difference between the 2 sessions, as well as the reference, and analyse what gaps in your knowledge keep you from matching the quality of the reference
4- study to bridge those gaps
5-repeat until got gud

why is this method not thrown around more?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]