/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2212917
>EECK wrong again. It undermines nothing.
Saying "no, you're wrong I'm right" is not an argument. You have to say "no, you are wrong because this and that".
You said, that as long as the product is good it doesn't matter what method you use, so does that not imply that 3D is actually not inherently better than 2D because according to you, 2D can create a product as good as 3D? If 3D truly was better than traditional animation, then wouldn't that mean that there is no way for a 2D animation to be better than 3D animation. Do you not see the contradiction you are making?
Name me one 2d animated film with EXCLUSIVE 2d backrounds. Just one. The only thing like this is richerd williams current "prologue" film that is an amalgamation of everything he has learned in the last 50 years. The 2d film just as good as a 3d film does not exist. Not yet anyway. So yes until it does 3d is still miles better lol.

>11secondclub has a focus on character animation and the audio clips rarely give room to work with proper composition, after all, it's not a storyboarding competition, it's an animation competition.

So you make a false claim, are given tangible proof that your claim is just as retarded as everyone thinks it is, and then deflect it with some bullshit cop out that it isn't a "proper composition"

lol for a second there I forgot where I was having this "debate". Do you think that the movies that have been coming out aren't everybit as good as this one? Have you been under a rock? Serious question