/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6721784
If you don't care about your art quality and want to improve as you make your webcomic, then at least learn the fundamentals of good COMIC-PANELING and COMPOSITION.
You don't have to master them but get to know the basics.

Look at the webcomic version of One Punch Man or Mob Psycho 100 by the author ONE.
He, just like you, sucks ass at drawing but why do people still read his webcomic other than the good writing?
ONE may be shit at drawing but he is great at paneling and composition.
His comics have a nice flow and aren't a chore to read.

Of course, your writing should be good as well.
Shit art can be excused as long as the writing is solid and the webcomic has a good readable flow, which is accomplished by good paneling and composition.

Nobody wants to read a comic that looks like it was drawn by a 6-year-old.
But if it has a good story and a nice readable flow? People might give it a chance.

>>6542753
>only of your own son's
I never said that.
>no one else would find them interesting
>this style is not very good
Look at the images I posted, all very well known and recognisable art, including picrel.
I am saying that you can make interesting and meaningful art regardless of whether it's overly polished or not.
AI can make your art look more polished, but that doesn't mean you wouldn't be able to make wonderful things without AI.