/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2678784
>>2678784
Assuming you're OP:

You're a total fucknut who can barely comprehend what art is, let alone what validates its criticism. Many respectable game critics can't develop a game, yet their criticism is valued because of their critical ability as well as their understanding of theory.

This also applies to art, as someone can study and comprehend theory and lead into an art critic, hence why those exists and why it's not just artists bashing each other.

I may be an outlier, but I find theory to come much easier than practice. Assuming this is more widely true, however, this would make most people quite well-equipped here to criticize you because they've longer understanding of artistic theory.

Also, "it was hard and you can't do better" is some of the most childish excuses I've ever seen in my life, I'll reiterate. Fucking imagine you played a game or read a book that was ass, became heavily criticized, and the response was exactly that.

With that in mind, your art is absolute trash, I definitely can do better and I'm shit, and you need to stop choking on dick because the balls slapping your eyes are blocking the view to waht you should be doing.

Pick up Loomis or drop art and fuck off. You don't want to study and take critique/advice and no one wants you here anyways.

>>2436245
futa penetration or just plain vanilla lesbianising. Everything else is for fags

>>2155969
He's a known Troll. Let them die alone and sad, don't respond, don't feed the b8, how new are you