/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6956304
but it is not other people's work. it is by all means the AI's work, everything i said about it highlights this fact.
(imo the argument is different for LoRa's btw. because especially artist loras can have much more significant influence from one singular source. it depends on whether you call copying a style plagiarism. and i would. but either way it is not copying images directly. the same ideas of generalization apply.)

yes, it took other people's work in the broadest sense, in order to learn, but the result is not at all yours, even if you were in the training data. that's the point. how can you claim that it stole something that isn't yours or anyone else's?

again, what it "took" are not things that belong to anyone in the first place. transformers need large amounts of data to learn, because they learn by pattern recognition. by seeing hundreds of round apples, it knows that the apple is a round thing, with a stem. and not any specific apple. the things that it learned, the shape, colors and textures of the apple, are not things you own, even if you have a painting of an apple.