/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7110634
>but how is that going to solve his anatomy problem?
there are two different goals here: understanding and accurately recreating anatomy and being able to draw something that rings "true" in terms of SOVL (not necessarily accurate)
I believe that /ic/ 99% of the time is obsessed with an arbitrary accuracy rather than creating something that is worth looking at.

>>7110646
>He taught Loomis, he taught Niclolaides and Reilly...
>He also taught Norman Rockwell
ok cool. follow up question: Did any of those shilled teachers create anything that is museum-worthy? i mean, i know the answer already ...

>Loomis:
painted dull conservative family portraits
>Leyendecker:
cigarette ads, emblems and gay horse jockeys.
>Rockwell:
American dream bs and way too many sus kids drawings

literally all of them are either illustrators for commercials or printing related jobs. so you guys rather learn from wage slaves than studying real artists like DaVinci? got it.