[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.3527968 [View]
File: 1.96 MB, 2656x3290, 45. Blue Green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3527968

>>3527498
>so if i prove that I've speared women's vaginas with my meatstick, my points are now validated?
well, no. You're an embarrassing baby that gets triggered by your strawman idea of what you think grils are precisely because you're super desperate to justify why you're an unfuckable faggot. You don't really have any "valid" points to make, because you're just flailing around attacking boogiewomyn that aren't interested in your shrimpy faggot "meatstick." The reality is that you're only making "points" at all to justify why you're a virgin, so their relative "validity" doesn't matter at all. It's not really a rational argument to start with.

Like, when you say:
>Women are emotionally unstable and petty.
It's funny because what would you say you're doing here?

We're in an incestuous hivemind of some of the most emotionally unstable, petty weirdos possible, but of course it couldn't possiibly be that you're an embarrassing faggot, it's just that they're too dang unstable and petty for someone as special as you.

>Pointing out biological realities is not toxic.
Well, A: your "biological realities" are subverted by the fact that you, a manboy, are unambiguously unstable and petty (and stupid and self-important to boot). B: Pointing out that
"Ancient Athenians" did anything at all is fucking stupid if you're a rational, well-informed person. They were also super into pederasty. Is that what you'd be into?

tldr: you project a desperate virginal angst that makes you embarrassing and gay and incapable of appreciating how much you project that you're embarrassing and gay with everything you do. You're the only reason nobody will fuck you.

>> No.3513983 [View]
File: 1.96 MB, 2656x3290, 45. Blue Green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3513983

>do you think you'll be remembered as fondly as me when we both die?

>> No.3505236 [View]
File: 1.96 MB, 2656x3290, 45. Blue Green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3505236

>>3505229
non that's Lena Heady from some photoshoot. Was painted with >>3505192 though which is a rare Green.

>> No.3306282 [View]
File: 1.96 MB, 2656x3290, 45. Blue Green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3306282

>>3305535
I'm responding again because I don't like that I posted Purple and Red without Blue.

>> No.3301470 [View]
File: 1.96 MB, 2656x3290, 45. Blue Green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3301470

>>3301460
Oh also I'm knowingly misusing Acrylic on a lot of them. Use too much water, use it too thin, smudge it into the canvas until the pigment starts to seperate. I know it's shit form and I'm abusing the medium but it's a somewhat-novel aesthetic at least?

Also this one is an example of what they often look like before the red layer and skin tone layers. Decided to keep this one blued.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]