/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5239268
that would be "muh style"

>>4316034
>So is artstation now DA tier?
>DA tier
Not a single sonic OC drawn in MS paint
Not a single weird /d/ fetish image
No shitty phographs of random trees

Artstation has a long way to go before it reaches DA levels.

>>4001790
>>4001791

>>3972466
should be stated as wolfface for the 2 people that don't know is this.

>>3963051
Literally EVERY furry construction video and book I have read is fundamentally the same as drawing a human head apart from 3 things

1.Muzzle drawing
2.Animal ears
3.teeth and "smile"

Unless you literally want to draw animals "furries" are almost exactly the same face wise despite being animals, the morphology brings it back into line with human facial features except for the 3 main things I mentioned.

There will be realistic furry artists who draw animal like skulls, but this is often the exception to the rule. Not even high tier artists like Fluff Kevlar or MilesDF draw realistic fur shit, because it's retarded if you want to draw a wolf, draw a fucking wolf they're majestic creatures, but unless you're exceptionally skilled drawing a wolf to 90% accuract then slapping a human smile will at best be uncanny and at worst, well pic related.