/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3773542
>Yes, against illegal immigration.
everyone is against illegal immigration. It goes without saying. What Trump did with the attempts at the muslim bans was an attempt to limit ALL travel from specific places based on religion. As Trump has shrieked over and over, when we talk about "border security" and when we're talking about stopping "immigration," it's NOT the standard, effective DEMOCRAT measures. It's big ass walls and muslim bans.
>Someone invites me into their home
What year were you "invited" and what did your family do to get the invite? What country? You think they'll care about what some previous administration did when they're kicking you out to preserve the demographic white majority? Do you think racists and white supremacists see you as "white?" Do they not teach you the "one drop rule" in the country you're going to get sent back to?
>and makes me part of the family.
If you show up and keep talking like some 3rd-world tribalist that wants American Exceptionalism to fall into the same kind of thought cancer that is destroying the place you fled from, then no you are not yet "part of the family." You're like Encino Man drawing stick figures on the TV with mustard. You're an infiltrator and subverter bringing your dangerous foreign mindset into a country in which you are clearly still a guest. When they start rounding up the immigrants and foreign invaders and kicking them out, you think your bootlicking is gonna save you?
>Should I close the door behind me or hold it open for the whole world to come into the house?
No you should leave. You are a foreign invader and you are stealing all the good white women. You are the reason I have a hard time talking to girls and spend all my time addicted to the internet. You are subverting and destroying my purity of essence.

>>3683905
should really finish that one and this one. so close to not being distractingly undone

>>3672357
>But that's wrong, you don't need to "act like a cunt" to lose your job.
You pretty much do. Like I guess you are right that if a bunch of spam bots bombard Disney with James Gunn pedophile jokes you can get fired, but that was "your" side doing that.
>You just have to say ONE critical thing about any of the protected issues that the left has deemed to have monopoly on
No you pretty much have to call black public servants terrorist monkeys.
>like #metoo
somehow I imagine a politically radicalized "incel" type that spends a lot of time on 4chan unironically consuming propaganda, you probably have a pretty good chance of saying something that's "offensive" to "essentially everyone." Social media platforms aren't "leftist." Corporations aren't "leftist." When you act like an embarrassing tribalist shitposter you make your employers look bad, and since we don't have employee protections because we live in a corporatist society, they'll fire your ass.
>#metoo, feminism and trans issues etc..
and another thing: Why the fuck do you spend a lot of time giving an actual shit about trannies and feminists and shit? You realize you they can pretty easily be avoided right? And like do you have a depth of knowledge on homo shit and trannies or something? Why do you think those are subjects you need to be involved in?
>on your private facebook to get an outrage mob demanding you to get fired.
Again this isn't really new though. 20 years ago if you publicly spent a lot of time talking shit about trannies or rape victims or whatever you'd still be fired. Just because new media has made it easier to stick your foot in your mouth in writing doesn't mean anything has changed.
>Meanwhile calling for violence on "drummpff xD" supporters
no one is really doing that. You do have Fox News employees and the President advocating for political violence though and they're doing ok.
>or posting pics of your asshole to a fellow artists
this a personal experience thing?

INFINITE