/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5135272
You have to realize that there's a lot of fraud and underhanded attempts at gaining any form of notoriety and faking a death is not an excluded factor of attaining petty subscribers and upboats, likes, and faves. No rules, just tools right guys?

>>4368845
Unbiased version:

>/ic/ is a red board which allows content that is not safe for work which means full nudity, sexual acts, and sex appeal is allowed.
>A very small but loud minority from an outside safespace wander off their shelter
>Despite the site warning users that it is only for adults and red boards such as /ic/ contain adult orientated material, the snowflakes insist on being exposed to the heat even though they know they cannot take it
>The snowflake(s) begin to have a melt down and start imposing for censorship and increased moderation

>A containment thread via the Porn Generals were created and explicitly states to please hide said threads if you do not wish to be subjected to adult orientated material despite /ic/ being a red board and completely okay to post NSFW material
>The Snowflakes were not satisfied, and demanded that any ambiguous figures with were illustrated with a flatchests to be deleted and be contained to /b/
>The draftsmen were pushed into a corner and realized if you give snowflakes an inch they take a mile and had no choice but to fight back and defend their rights to express themselves
>Seeing how /ic/ was originally established as NSFW the Porn Generals were disbanded and fellow illustrators began to practice their rights to participate in any thread of their choosing as it is within the rules.
>The snowflakes would not have it, a shitstorm ensued, things were said, feelings got hurt

>Mods realized it was a dumpster fire and if you let it be it would be put out on its own
>Ironically the same snowflakes that pushed for heavy moderation and censorship made things worse by giving mods unnecessary headaches.
>Snowflakes continue to bitch and moan despite having other avenues and sites that cater to their wants and needs
>The buttpain continues to this day

>>3754870
>There are people on /ic/ right now that unironically do this
Your frog posting does not help negate the fact that you have a bad cause of autism. Who goes around prepared to spout Loomis and Bridgman to a real life DA tard? Be honest - did you also mentally prepare yourself for such a scenario?

>>3635187
Under the communist manifesto, people are treated as a resource or property and unless you relinquish your freedom and individuality completely to the state they would have executed you long ago. These are very dangerous times where quasi-communists such as yourself can attempt to usurp the social landscape under the guise of "tolerance" and "love" and "social-justice" and censor freedom of speech and expression.

If the only remedy from ideological subversion means to execute people I am all for it, contribute to the collective and kill yourself.

>>2711359
>we get people saying "But i've got this person that charges less and does the same or less".

That's called being a part of a competitive free market, silly.

>>2635495
Good, good, congratulations you are the first Anon that has ever posted anything remotely factual.

However

>>2472133
>i thought it was a regular girl with one of those dick and balls strapons that go inside the cunt

You can't compete with the real thing m8.

>>2437721
Don't lump /pol/ with this just because a couple of us are from /pol/ doesn't mean /pol/ is raiding /pol/ does not care about /ic/ and the last time I mentioned /ic/ on /pol/ was when we where distributing Christmas Cards to other boards and Anons didn't even know this place existed.

It's easy blaming it on /pol/ when it is obviously you making a big deal about it when it is not.