/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6680972
>can be
Being the key phras. Yes, I know, not all men, not all women, yadda friggin yadda. I know. I know MarmaladeMum exists. I was talking generally. Averages. I hate that I have to make a disclaimer like this every single time I'm making an observation on average tendencies, or else someone always takes it the wrong way. I'm not putting "cunts on a pedestal" either. Sheesh.

You can't critique shit about your machine vomit.
>erm yes maybe try inputting "masterpiece" and negative prompting "bad drawing" and then create a LORA model so close to the thing you want to get that it's basically tracing, and then maybe there's a chance you won't get a penrose triangle of an arm when you're done sifting through the 1000 gacha prompts your melting GPU just sharted
People here want to learn to actually draw not to be failed drawfag wannabes. Find another fucking hobby if you hate creating so much you'd let a computer do it in your stead. You're clearly not welcome in any art circles anyhow by virtue of being insufferable clowns somehow even worse than your average bpd artfag, when will that get through your thick ape skull.

>>6388897
Current diffusion models won't. It's too vague and limited
>cant do details
>cant do interesting poses
>cant draw fotm characters quick enough because you have to feed it enough art made by others for it to copy it
>cant produce consistent results to create believable comics etc where you need the character to look more or less the same
>cant replicate someones style and sell it without a horde of angry people knocking at your door and cancelling out for being a thieving faggot
>cant produce concept art on the level required for industry jobs that require detailed character sheets and precise demands to get a coherent visual look (again its too vague and you cant for example conceptualize a 3d model based on a shitty drawing full of AI vomit artifacts)
Its only there for low standards coomers looking for a quick release, attention starved techchuds who get a false sense of validation sharing their shitty derivative pics among themselves and desperate indie gamedevs too poor to use anything else. If AI learn how to bash details and dynamic poses it'd have more ground to stand on, but even there, this technology was engineered to solve utterly non-existent issues in an already oversaturated and highly competitive market.

The only real problems AI might cause for artists is flooding the shit out of art platforms with unproperly tagged pictures. The only people this technology might put out of business are stock photo providers.