/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

way too many tools, but that's if for now.

eh, i wonder what bringing it all together actually will take.
i can see myself just redrawing the entire scene, but taking ideas from various gens as reference. but in that case it's all manual and i basically used the AI as an elaborate reference tool. but i'm sure there's more to be gotten out of here.
also i want to focus a bit more on composition, color lighting in my next experiments, as here i mostly focused on creating a fitting background.
but in theory i could use any step here as an input for the next step.

>>6966897
>When a human learns from artwork, they are engaging in a deeply personal and subjective experience. They bring their own emotions, memories, and interpretations to the artwork, creating a unique understanding that is inherently human. This process is not just about acquiring information, but also about personal growth and emotional connection.
this is ultimatively just more information.
not only more, a lot more, and a lot more varied. and not only in the form of images.

>When a machine ‘learns’ frm artwork, it is essentially processing data.
"data" like what a dog looks like and what its features are.

>It doesn’t have personal experiences or emotions to bring to the artwork.
because it doesn't have personal anything. it only a highly specific tool build for image generation.

>It doesn’t ‘understand’ the artwork in the way a human does. it simply analyzes patterns and generates output based on its programming.
it does understand in sofar as it relates to visuals. in pic related, it sees an open window. so it knows that thre should be light.
it doesn't know what light means, what emotions it evokes, but it understands how it should look like based on what it has learned.
its entire world is visuals.