/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6869527
Anon, as a prompter, you basically have no influence or hands into the creation of image generation.

You are
>input words
>hope for the machine to shit you out any image you might like
That's like throwing sticks on the ground and feeling accomplished that something resembling a smiley face appeared.
Or taking a picture of a cloud that resembles anything and claiming you did the cloud.

If anything, that's peak delusions that only stems from anyone who cannot, for the life of them, get any attention or acknowledgement they are really desperate for, otherwise.
It's like artists copying csr/sakimi and trying to farm numbers.
It's all purely logical and well observed.

Radically speaking; A generated Image CANNOT be the result of a human vision, because the images are being created by already existing data and images and more or less mashed together, and we had this argument countless times already here.
>b-b-b-but the ai learns and diffusses because its in the name
No one cares about the techno gibberish and it's irrelevant anyway and is mostly just an attempt to argue from authority if anything, hence a bad faith argument and bait ;)))

You cannot disagree with this and be correct.