/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2260352
it clearly is bad advice because instead of pointing out something wrong with the image you go with the generic
>something somewhere in this image isn't perfectly 100% accurate to human drawings
which is especially worse when it is quite possible it was an intended "mistake"

pic related has "bad anatomy" but you can be damn sure your critique means nothing to them. because in comparison you're a retard floundering in the dark trying to "critique" despite having no knowledge or skill to back yourself up with.