/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6767988
yes unironically they represent what women who call for "le fixing" of legacy media for "current times"
tumblerite women represent what women become when given unchecked power
i was pretty specific i believe so it aint my fault i insulted that specific demograph and you felt personally called out
sounds like a "you" problem

>>6767997
>White older conservative critic.
aka irrelevant to actual art discourse idk why it even compares to modern women ruining shit because it makes them insecure
anime tiddies come to mind but lets not forget the cringe wokification of "official" subtitles/dubs """western""" localizers get their hands on
men will at most complain and/or make their own thing with aspect they want changed but it takes the capacity for spite and hate inherent to women to reach across the wall and ruin specifically male-oriented fantasy for their own agenda

women ruin everything if given the chance, period (pun intended lmao)
now scamper away you unlovable scamp
noone takes you seriously and your dad was probably completely right about you

I'm convinced nobody has actually gotten through OP's book, not even the guy who wrote it. If you understand vanishing points and how to gauge distance accurately by subdividing I think that's good enough. If you want to learn how to draw in curvilinear perspective maybe that's worth reading about. I guarantee you 90% of artists just make shit up when it comes to perspective and it just werks.