/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6220775
Nope, no legal battles are going to happen as the AI technically references said images and most images are of free use. Unless the AI directly plagiarizes visual art that is proprietary on a 1:1 but it doesn't do that instead it composes a library of images based on your input to create something new. Think of the AI as an elaborate collage putting together images that suggests what image you're attempting to describe. Most of the AI art is also somewhat abstract and suggests a painting of a figure rather than giving you an actual figure. AI is here to stay either learn to adapt or get culled.

>>3105944
>touts photoshop, a program that literally everyone uses as the fucking magnum opus of his resume
>his work doesn't speak for itself

$10 says I am worlds ahead of you.