[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.3580950 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3580950

>>3580891
no that's tv and film's Evangeline lilly

>> No.3578920 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3578920

>>3578894
>Literally, all I did was grayscale the image, a common value check in a lot of art circles.
I wasn't saying it was interesting because I thought you were magic. It's interesting to see how the gloss and matte and gesso played.
>This is correct.
No. It isn't. Is this OP? You're stagnating because you're fucking retarded.
>All of the subjects are faces
Commonly referred to as "portraiture" in a lot of art circles. How do you not know what "subject" means?
>facing to the right. I've not seen anything else from you yet.
>>3578882 was facing camera technically. leaning right. Also it's more than a face too huh? Bit of legs and body and arms thrown in.
>It has become increasingly clear that you will never improve beyond this point.
I'm sure. Not sure what this has to do with you stagnating though?
>You've lost your objectivity and ability for self-criticism
I'm pretty self critical. I'm not really sure what specifcally your point even is tbphwyf. The conversation is supposed to be about stagnation. I'm constantly learning and growing and trying new things. Are you?
> or maybe you've never had it
Had what? There is no "it." Just do stuff boring faggot. Nobody is ever impressed by how much you convince yourself you COULD do things if you felt like it.
>You take every criticism as an affront to your fragile ego.
I'm just responding to (you)s. Projecting?
>By the way, here's something a did about a year ago
You drew a cartoon face a year ago? Wow girl you sure nailed it.
>covering the same subject matter that your paintings covered
You really don't know much about art huh?
>It's not perfect, I know
nah dog that shit is aces. And you only drew it A YEAR AGO!? Wow.
>but it shoes at least some amount of things that we talked about here.
what that you're full of shit?

>> No.3577546 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3577546

>>3577532
nothing in art is about "need."

>> No.3573473 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3573473

>>3573446
say that to muh face ya doingus

>> No.3573064 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3573064

>>3573052
you should set rules and a reward system or something so you have the perception that you're being externally motivated to do it regardless of your faggot feelings. Do a self portrait every day for a month or something, and then have a reward/reinforcement schedule type of situation.

Every day after you draw it you get a candy or something. Every week you get a bigger reward. Every month you get a yuge reward. Some kinda shit. Positive reinforcement.

And you could do some kind of deprivation meme where you can't do X until after you do the daily selfie portrait. Like can't have a drinkey until you do your self portrait or some shit. Or if you're not an substance addict you could do no fap until you do the portrait, but then you're kind of literally behaviorally conditioning narcissism. Which is bad.

Actually nevermind maybe don't brainwash yourself.

>> No.3571931 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3571931

>>3571923
>But it's also more often than not a crutch or excuse to compensate for lack of ability.
There is no barrier to entry for making art. The people that tell you there is some magical level to be achieved before you start making "pieces" are lying to you because they're selling you a product.

There are countless successful artists that were never anything other than adequate at sketching. There are artists that are and were functionally incapable of "rending their vision" without "cheating." There are no rules if what you're doing is appealing or sellable.

>> No.3557059 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3557059

ayyy

>> No.3557052 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3557052

>>3557003
try it with a lighter background so they're more defined at the bottom?

>> No.3557036 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3557036

>>3557034
or whatever it just made me think of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Wave_off_Kanagawa

>> No.3557022 [View]
File: 983 KB, 3024x4032, memeirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3557022

>>3547839

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]