/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

https://youtu.be/4ADA9RcN31A

this guy gets it. Makes the good point that you can use blacks to bring down cool colors like blue without destroying everything

>>3574382
idk honestly. I should try and figure that out. Been thinking of getting a flight logbook and treating meme painting logging like pilots log their hours. Can even get one of things that you strap to your thigh. I can probably look at the time lapse hours and get a rough estimate of year one and two. 2018 has been pretty bananas though. Like this shit has been all I do.

here's the first year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45GkUiuRmjM

>>3559793
Lost power and got bored and read this.
>taking the most fleeting, obscene images - reaction faces - and starting to paint them - which as i said, has been done to death by hundreds of other mediocre artists
Name 27.
>in no way supports the things you state.
yeah huh.
>you cry about nothing really mattering on a cosmic scale
It's not crying it's just a statement on the nature of reality. It's what motivates me. Big fan of absurdism.
>and what you do is creating something that matters even less
Everything matters equally less. It's all just perception and fabricated value. You think money launderers care about le fundamentals?
>that doesn't appeal
To who? People seem to be drawn to them.
>that won't surprise anyone really
Surprises them more than not doing it eh
>if you would really act by those standards, you'd be going into a nihilistic abstraction like Malevich
non non non absurdism
>the issue with painting newbies is that they have a vague concept in mind that they both fail to describe consistently
I mean I've been working on a wiki about this shit. Been pretty consistent.
>it is simply too vague and ambiguous in a bad way.
Just like your shitpost attempt at "critique." You're not demonstrating anything. You're just going "nah uh" to what I'm doing. Post your statues.
>you will find yourself puzzled by the things they talk about
That's probably because you're fucking stupid brah.
>if i'd seen your paintings in an exhibition space
You wouldn't would you dipshit.
>i would without hesitation categorize you as a freshman in art uni in his very first semester
t. sophomore
> that is exactly that level of conceptual maturity (or rather, complete lack of) that your work oozes.
Perfect. If it triggers an uppity knownothing like you I must be doing something right.

>>3558615

>>3558334
>oh, look another double spaced paragraph by a persistent retard accompanied by a shitty beginner painting
yeah exactly. What's the problem?
>surely im going to read all of this.
You are in command of your destiny kiddo. You can't control anyone else. You can only control what you do. Going out of your way to stress that you struggle to read is what you choose to do.
>theory does not make good art, good art makes good art
Seriously why are you so stupid? Do you not know a whole lot about much of anything?

But I guess yeah you can't read so my fault for engaging with you. Joke's on everyone else for assuming you're fundamentally capable amirite? I make schlock art and you act like a fucking retard anonymously.

You
>can
be
>my
hero
>bb.

>>3533344
>So, besides political stuff, is posting about personal shit (even light hearted) a big no-no for you people?
it can definitely alienate potential consumers.

I'd say it's more a no-no just because it invites triggered retards to use their safe space anonymity to act like sniveling faggots and attack everything you do to make themselves feel better about all the things they don't do.

I would keep your bidness pages unemcumbered with politiks or drama, unless that's part of your thing. Just make shitposting accounts for everything else.