/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6959949
>WOW CRAB SCHIZO IC BAD I CANT EVEN
Anon probably revealed some information that threatens someone
>>6960049
>>6960082
>>6960027
And there you go.

It ain't really such a bad thing. After all, flavor of the month trash is just a product. Only a fool would believe all those artists are completely on their own pumping out content 24/7, being terminally online while also drawing and being aware of all the trends at any given time.

>>6763610
As far as i have observed, he seems really desperate to be acknowledged for being a comic artist rather than some coom-printer that he goes this far to try to clown on anons for twitter clout and circlejerk with other delusional fags like him.
Imagine, some 30 yo faggot spending his time spamming the same threads every month and then going on twitter and saying;
>"wow this guy is ragebaiting he must be obsessed i dont even post on ic lol lmao"
without being prompted to or having any real reason to be that specific.
It's very obvious he makes these threads himself.

If he wants to know his true value as an artist he should stop drawing the big titty muscle girls and see where that takes him.
The thing is, he fucking knows that no one gives a shit about his comic and only follows for the coom, and given his behavior, it bothers him a lot.

You gotta ask yourself, why give yourself so much work in making a comic when you could be working less, not be seen as a hack by others and rake in the dough from even more coomers?
He writes porn comics, but draws no porn. That's all he does.
>>6763639
He has 200k followers so he must believe everyone is just jelly & crabbing and jealous of his """success""".
Social media was really a mistake.

>>6722259
>Why even draw?
Why do you jerk off?
>Art was made to look at
Then look at it.
>What am i supposed to do?
Draw.
>i am lonely
Get used to it, it ain't getting better and anyone that tells you otherwise does not have your best interest in mind.

>>6494381
If only she was real, amirite?

>>6444973
And Anon, what even matters to you if someone calls themselves an artist or how they make something?

Everyone that says the exact same thing you say:
>b-b-b-but they r not REAL ARTISTS
just come off as children who are shitting themselves over the realization that being an artist is nothing special since anyone with paint on their dick or smearing their own feces on a canvas can call themselves one, and you're feeling your speshul identity card revoked.
>a stick figure has more weight
The overall great majority of art are meaningless scribbles, kitsch or straight up porn. And the famous works of art are mostly only financial assets.

If AItrannies call themselves artists, i do not give a shit.
If Artists call themselves artists, i do not give a shit.
Call yourself however you want, you're all retarded niggers trying to find something to build an identity around to me.

>>6417091
>disney or nintendo
Very bad example, Anon.
>industry insiders are currently smug about this whole thing so there's currently something going on behind the scenes we probably won't know about for a while.
Who is saying and what has been said?
In cases like this a vague statement is really not sufficient.

I've been always going off on my own regarding statements and predictions about AI, and i have been right every time.
I only see it getting more and more prevalent in a professional artists workflow and more widely accepted for being cost/time efficient.
Will it kill artists? No.
It will remain how it has always been; 1% of professional get all the gigs from big companies and the others live off scraps.

There are probably insane profits to be projected with the full commercial application of generated images, so this will never go away.
All in all, all the "protesting" anons are claiming to do, is useless since they're playing a losing game or this shit might as well be the AI trolls just false flagging to further the conflict.

The only real advice i can give is to literally stop giving a shit about AI and draw.
Art is a losing game, if you want to win, play by your own rules.

>>6294372
unbelonging. desecrating. selfish. obnoxious. synthetic.

what i meant to say was check out this cute oc i made i based off nito from fgo