/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1984882
Ok I found it. So you're aware of symbol drawing, But I circled some areas for you to look at. It looks like you're attempting semi-realism. Given the extra detail and proportion in your drawing.

So the areas i quickly circled, I'd classify as symbol drawing. You "THINK" you know what that looks like, so you're relying on back logs of information in your mind, symbols. That's the best way to describe it. You drew flat hair with no forms or overlap, even >>1984807 has some overlap in the hair, despite being a flat, cartoon drawing. It's essence is well represented.

Your entire drawing is super flat, but look at the right hand, it's formless and the only overlap is the middle finger. The breasts, is that what they would look like, or is that what you THINK is what they look like.

No form or depth in the left knee, the frills in the underdress is super flat, that's not what they would look like. Symbolic frills.

Worst of all the dress tails there. You clearly did that wrong, that's where you use overlap, the volume is clearly wrong.

Looks like you were aware of symbols in the face and tried to get that right. There's some semblance of depth, but the under plane of the nose is flat and somewhat symbolic. Eyebrows unconnected to the brow of the skull? The lids of the eye you probably got somewhat correct, but it's still a symbol of being aware of symbols. You think you know that lids go around the ball of the eye. But where is the ball of the eye anon?

You basically got a lot of things wrong. Aggressively challenged everybody. And want to be spoonfed on your boring drawing.