>>4114098
>You don't go on a hotdog stand and tell the dude "hotdog is a great food, but you should replace the bread with lettuce".
But this is the essence of how the market works. You do something for an audience, and then a member of the audience eventually says "Hey that's cool, but what if you did this?", and now you've been presented with this whole new market opportunity and a whole new demographic to appeal to. That's why Ford doesn't just make trucks, they make everything. That's why your favorite burger joint probably sells a chicken sandwich. That's why Disney has a theme park. That's why 33% of McDonald's revenue is from real estate. Nobody is just a fucking auteur with universal appeal throughout the entirety if time and space. You're selling art. Eventually that art will either lose appeal or you as an artist will desire more funds/exposure, and either when that happens or as a means to prevent that, you have to take a cue from the audience.
>>4114018
This is a shitty bait thread with a shitty bait OP. The image is retarded because the point of art is that you don't have to imply things, they're either there or not. That's why boorus operate on that "Tag What You See" system, because nobody looks at art just to ponder subjects that aren't depicted. You look at art to see things.
And secondly it's a bit retarded to imply that only white people want to be models. There's fashion models of all types. It follows there are live models of all types.