/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7123022
AI/fake accusations will just be the catalyst;
What you need to fear is the court of public opinion.

If retards nowadays are willing to go out their way to fuck with people and spread/parrot misinformation to get clout on social media, what makes one think anyone accused of something would ever get the chance of being found not-guilty?

If AI technologies and image generation software doesn't get restricted, social media or information sharing will with the excuse of safety from enemy states (chinese spies and russian bots, antisemitism, etcetera)
Tiktok is getting banned based on this.

It's only a matter of time until someone generates some controversial political picture that goes viral.
>>7122930
Because the average cattle doesn't, doesn't mean you don't have to care either.
On the other hand, AI is like giving guns to the mentally ill, so matter the applications.
>How are people in 100 years supposed to know if old paintings, drawings or even historical photos are genuine?
They won't care.
The average normie and art consumer only cares about porn, pretty pictures or wow-that-is-so-me media i.e. Kitsch, they do not care about anything else.
This was artist's fault as well, especially the online artists of the last decade flooding the internet with the aforementioned content in pursuit of fame and money, which in return attracted bad actors to try and get a piece of that pie.

Can Artificial Intelligence be useful; sure in the extreme cases where human physical and mental capabilities cannot ever hope to function, such as deep diving, space travel or terraforming hostile planets.
Performing and replacing acts of human expression is the absolute worst way to apply AI, but people don't care because they're low IQ and just want to consume.

REMINDER;
Consumer don't ask questions.
Consumer likes and consumes product.

>>4246220
>Implying that most of /pol/ meme talking points aren't as old as recorded history.
>all I'm asking is for you to tell me how it is you type and think like /pol/ without being from there. >It's a simple question
It's a retarded question.
It's the usual ideological bait and switch
>"Which side are you on haha i knew it look at me and how morally higher i am than you"
I say it again; it's pretty obvious that you're simply trying to jerk off your own ego instead of actually discussing a topic.
Because anyone with half a functioning brain can put 1 and 1 together in regards of societal, hierarchical and financial structure.
It's even easier to see who's who since we have easily accessible information.
>>4246231
>And I think it's naive to think that there isn't a global elite of sorts
basically what this Anon said
the joos is just a meme word used, to describe the psychopaths at the top of the money chain, spawned from the many coincidences of jewish related propaganda and actions throughout history. Also mostly because it's still jews pulling strings in the current heated political climate and being overrepresented in many fields despite being a very small minority.
You have to be a brainwashed normie to argue against facts because
>nu uh think illegal
but to be fair, this is a filthy normie board
And normies sure like to talk about shit they don't know jack about

>>4136131
why even try to defeat something that can't be beaten?
The meaning of this life is to make money and consume.
All this will fuck us badly in the end
Why prolong the suffering when you can accelerate?