/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6801871
There's nothing wrong with the tool. Majority agree it's a useful tool. The issue comes with the blatant plagiarism the Ai images create. So much so, the better the "ai art" the closer it is to the original image. You think the strange colors and the "blurry" parts of the images are just side effects of what happens when you mold several images into one? No. Ai art is literally just one image with a color gradient over the image and sometimes a blur filter. Sometimes the Ai will get a little "creative" and slightly change the background of said original image. The minor alterations makes it more difficult to search for the original image, but there's tools in the works to help the Ai search for Ai.
So to my original statement. Yes, ai art is a useful tool as a Search Engine. It's great at finding other Images. To believe it creates them is next level delusion. That's like to say google creates content for me anytime I look something up. And the better the Ai becomes, the better it just gets at finding images. That's it.