/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6710747
pyw coward

I think I have found a solution to the AI problem, or at least a potentially beneficial application of AI to protect artists that are unwilling to have their intellectual property abused for AI training.
AI proponents usually argue that "styles can't be copywritten!", and that gives them every right to train your art style with AI models. This is true, but it is incredibly subjective for a human to determine where one person's style ends and where another person's style begins. Legally, this murkiness makes it difficult to properly defend an artist's artstyle.
But as we have seen, AIs have no trouble understanding what an artist's distinctive 'style' is. An AI can clearly differentiate between two different styles, and can mathematically determine the difference between them. Since AI doesn't actually create its own unique art styles, but just meshes them together, an AI could also determine what percentage of an image is generated using copywritten material.
With this logic, why shouldn't we push for AI-assisted copyright protections on artstyles to defend artistic copyright from AI scrapers?