/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7030448
Very true. Some of CSR's clones have become almost as popular as him despite making inferior traces of his work. Overabundance is only an issue for the people whose job it is to create stuff. CONSOOMERS just CONSOOM whatever is in front of them. This is why Netflix subscriptions still grew after Netflix's anti-consumer policy changes, because Netflix knew from their data that there are mindless drones who will binge 18 near-identical romcoms back to back, and renew membership to do it all over again.

>>4999956
>no one is saying things
Yet you're heavily implying a lot of things.
I'm saying that you have no case.
You want to attach something to someone because of similarities.
If it's not a 1;1 copy, it doesn't count.
Pic related is the best example.
Heavily copied from? Yes.
Traced? Nope.

You can get your jimmies rustled all you want, but this is the business you work or want to work in.
Even i got my shit stolen by some begs.
>>4999982
In a overall sense, yes.

>>4976318