/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Why should I use him over loomis?

>>5126048
Here is a page from loomis's book. It feels odd to learn how to draw the mannequin and then add layers to it for the body and then supposed to forget it.

Are there any skeleton/stick figure methods out there like the loomis mannikin?

>>3537757
yeahhh work on that anatomy and construction before you figure out a style

Is there documentation on different types of mannequins from various artists?

Is there documentation on different types of mannequins from various artists?

Trying to look through different types and decide which i prefer while i do mannequin posing/ perspective excercises.

Post your preferred mannequin if you don't mind.

>>3001300

Measure better. Among other things your ribs are way too low, shoulders too narrow, those hips are comically tiny, the legs are too short. With your stuff side by side there isn't really a good excuse for proportions to be that skewed. Take your time.

The actual construction method you used is fine, though I would recommend using cylinders rather than lines to show form and brush up on basic shapes in general. You want a shorthand for showing the direction things are facing and foreshortening, the simplest way to do that is using 3 dimensional shapes (you can easily tell which way a cylinder is facing, not so with a flat line).

Also if you want an example of an alternative mannekin the loomis one is decent, too.

>>2010379
Learn to draw the rib cage like a solid shape first, then start defining ribs within it.
Pic related, loomis mannequin