/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5127966

who cares

traps are honestly worse than women im sure

there is actually nothing worse than a man who wants to get attention the same way women do

i can guarantee you from this one picture that whoever that is has no personality actually

Don't try to twist it. It was a thinly-veiled request thread. Next time, use >>>/r/.

>>2936007
>art history

>>2868154
1. As long as you're putting in 100% genuine, hard-working effort, don't let anybody tell you that you're "not improving fast enough."

2. You're putting graphite lines onto paper. This should not cause "so much sadness and frustration."

3. If someone tells you to jump off of a cliff, would you do it?

You don't strike me as a very independent person. Are you a neet? Do you live at home? At this point if you have this sort of attitude towards art (and I'll take a guess and say a lot of things in your life) and you find it difficult you probably will still be frustrated for a long time. I really don't like telling anybody that they won't make it because everybody can - it's more of an issue if they have the willpower. But you need an immaculate attitude change if you want to be anywhere anytime soon.

Just because you put a lighter complexion, she still looks black because she has black features. Niggastrat at it again

>>2842276
>who cares

faggots like you are why I fucking hate this field.

at least put effort into your bait next time

>>2822143
How old are you?
Do you have a disability?

I'm sorry, but I'm not trying to be rude. I'm genuinely curious.

stop announcing your goals for attention, just fucking do them

>it's a "beginner cries about how they aren't good a week after they start drawing" episode

who the fuck is samefagging here

why does this gen have such a higher ratio of images/constructive criticism:crying about art than the others