/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3570924
>you arent funny
You're hilarious.
>youre only annoying.
Says the guy covered in soup.

>>3558098
>What is your goal as an artist?
trigger some nitwit virgin to murder me out of spite
>What do you hope to achieve?
death
>What draws you to art?
subversion
>What qualities make an artwork good?
eye feel
>Is popularity important?
Probably.
>Can abstract art or porn art be good art?
yes

>>3545631
>it's shit.
I'm enjoying it. Sorry you're upset I guess?
>And don't say that is the point
Honestly it's all for the (you)s most likely.
>cause that would be a pretty fucking lame uninteresting point.
Which part, exactly? Do you have a continuous timelapse of a process where you work on ~250 paintings over 20 months edited chronologically to groovy tunes? Do you have a series of paintings about the nature of memetics and behavioral psychological messaging in the internet revolution? Are you documenting your own self-destruction over the span of a decade?

This shit isn't uninteresting. Particularly not to me. Which is why I'm doing it. I'd talk shit about the things you choose to you're not even interesting enough for that.

And how did you watch an hour long thing in 5 minutes? Seems like you're being disingenuous?

Anyweigh I like the end with the fappening painting being edited to the American Dream chorus outro thing. https://youtu.be/45GkUiuRmjM?t=3346

I also like the reflektor sequence generally. https://youtu.be/45GkUiuRmjM?t=1945

And like, you say "shit art with an innovative meaning is still shit art" but then you move the goalposts and then act uppity about how "uninteresting" you think it is. idk who you are anon. Why would I give a shit if you find me interesting?

What a boring cuck. Do you ever wonder why you're so self-important and entitled? Do you ever wonder if consumerism has gone too far? Also, what do you think the best way to prepare and eat a finger would be?

>>3541844
>you obscure your points so much it's useless having a conversation with you.
what's being "obscured?" I'm telling you egg sackly why and how I justify doing stuff.
>post work if you want crits, but stop posting this bullshit.
Or what? You'll be upset?

and nothing against virgins. it's just that it was a major part of the active measures stuff, particularly the stuff being done cambridge analytica and the whole "rootless white males" campaign that Bannon was all up dem guts about. "Gamers" is a fuck you memeword for virgins as far as political psychographic marketing is concerned. Gamergate was an active campaign to organize and radicalize virgins.

It's what US and Russian counter intelligence contractors were doing to virgins in the middle east for years to make em do more goofy shit to justify shooting more expensive things at them.

The beautiful GRRM irony of it all is that the psyops messaging and information warfare campaign strategies that the US conducted against muslims and south americans to radicalize and agitate them against each other for the last few decades got turned back against us and has been working better than gangbusters.

Americans were implicitly conditioned to believe that if something makes them feel good about themselves, it must be "true." So when we start getting nailed with subversive self-destructive messaging from our "friends" on our social media experience, and we just yes anded our way into whoopsy nazism.

actually I'll post this one too

>i am better than you so i dont really need to worry about it
you didn't need to "worry about it" anyway so it was weird that you felt the need to stress this in the first place. And what's it matter if you're better than everyone if all you do is act like a belligerent shrimpdicked asshole while painting faggy tree paintings that knock off shit that prople were doing 100 years ago? You got a Salieri complex or what?

>best part is you imagine yourself being famous
I mean I don't really care that much. anyone can be famous. but like, do "imagine yourself as famous" right now? With your tree paintings?
>but youll still be painting shitty memes
yeah probably. and you'll still be making hack scapes then?
>while i already have a following hahahha
How big is your following brah? You think I can fit your following in my mouth?

>>3507205
>I dont paint but im thinking about getting into it.
do it.
>how did you pick your theme?
idk I didn't really worry about themes at first. I painted the sadfleck >>3506096 mostly to troll the snydercucks that were shilling for batman v superman on /tv/.

Then I did >>3505160 from a webm I would spam and that's kind of the thesis for things that I find aesthetic as fuck. It's a beautiful, well-dressed person acting like a fucking weirdo. idk I've always enjoyed thinking about and studying concepts like subversiveness and disorder and entropy and absurdism and that's all kind of part of it probably.

Just do what you want and follow your impulses towards creative production and figure it out on the way. Like the cartoon where they're building the track from the train or whatever.