/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6655414
< technical prowess + meaning and without having tits or dicks for easy neuron activation while it btfos every pornfag in current existence since they will never have any of their shit ever appreciated for more than the milliseconds of novelty they provide for chronic masturbators
>>6655428
Fair point, but a picture being pretty for consumption doesn't shield it from being criticized, it rather confirms what i've already said.
>art is made for people's enjoyment
Yeah, if you're a fucking normie.
>what's truly worthless is ugly fetish shit made by schizos
Exactly, furry art is worthless trash even lower than the lowest kitsch and lgbt porn fanart of the fotm.
>>6655422
>waaaaah idc but lemme reply by how much i don't care
No one asked, nigga.
>>6655425
And?
>>6655431
Why do you bother replying if all you're going to do is bait and have bad faith arguments?
I really don't get you niggas.
>all good art is kitsch by your standards.
Good art by what criteria? Yours?
Go consume and shut the fuck up you worthless catlle.

Take pic related, "The sin", as an example:
Why would this work be artistically meritable and valuable, even though it illustrates vulgarity?
Because it actually dared to illustrate sin without relying on sexuality = merit
It depicted the highest sin for men and women of faith and pushed the limits of what could be acceptable as a piece of art = critical expression + purpose
Even though the act itself is sexual, it is represented as purely as possible without trying to appeal to the monkey brain.
Of course there were people who jacked off to that, but that don't mean shit.
>but if you can't find any correlation with "normal" art
You're arguing for yourself and by being highly subjective.
I'll say it again; you have a conflict of interest.
If you admit that porn has no real artistic value, you might hurt yourself and your work.
You can't argue objectivity with subjectivity.
>we simply aren't gonna agree on this
Yes, but you're wrong, that's the point.

If you want to believe what you want, more power to you, but don't try to argue objectivity and facts to try and warp reality to suit yourself.
There is no point in even trying to argue then.

The Sin - Heinrich Lossow (1880) This is one of the most controversial works of art in history. This painting represents an event that actually occurred in a diary (Liber Notarum) by an apostolic. Cardinal César Borgia organizes a dinner where there were 5 prostitutes who “entertained” the guests.