[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6983721 [View]
File: 73 KB, 295x240, 156532717931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6983721

>>6983704
Dude, Im positive you're reading just what you want to read, so let me spell it for you clear as day
1. I agree the threads should stay SFW and I never stated otherwise
2. Despite the aforementioned, I strongly believe you guys are exxagerating about NSFW art in the thread and not even doing anything about it.

You guys are making a level 5 tornado in a glass shot, blowing the problem out of proportion and not even bothering to try and do something to solve the problem at hand. You saw one anon posting NSFW, and what did you do? You started complaining about it >>6983647 >>6983661 instead of telling the anon to not post NSFW on the thread like, what do you know, *I did*.

So next time you see someone posting NSFW on this thread, rather than acting like a bunch of whiney bitches and screeching "reee dead thread too much porn me no like!", how about you tell said anon to not do it and point at the SFW rule instead just so we can keep these threads SFW?

>> No.6908561 [View]
File: 73 KB, 295x240, 156532717931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6908561

>6908532
I dont understand why people pull this rhetoric every single time. God forbid you criticize someone's poor argument against something because you are received with strawmen posts and screeching about how you are being a bootlicker even if the original post wasnt in defense of the work.

These people dont pull a compelling argument and when you point at the flaws on their argument while asking them to be more insightful, they double down on the autism. Im not going to humor your argument of bad faith and stupidity, keep hating for the sake of it, you're the one affected by it.

Not even giving you the (You)

>> No.6481025 [View]
File: 73 KB, 295x240, 156532717931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6481025

>This whole thread
Let me get this straight... The person who OP gifted to is in the obligation to compensate him for whatever OP has done for them, and whoever goes against this premise is "entitled", correct? You guys even know what entitlement is? What you all are preaching is actual entitlement bullshit.

For starters, if you're doing something for someone expecting something in return that's okay when it comes to the exposure game, but due to the nature of this very same game, you also need to expect not getting what you expected because that's how it all works.

That said, just because someone did something for you doesnt mean you are in the obligation to reward them. Granted, a grateful response is to be expected because that is something we're taught to do, but that's as far as it can go, anything else comes from your selflessness and good will as a gifted, not because of any informal contract of "I did this to you and now you need to repay me somehow!".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]