[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.7084040 [View]
File: 98 KB, 1100x619, fun-facts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7084040

>>7083916
>a specific dad who made a tierlist which hurt my ego
okay but were they wrong?
>"yes, I'm (much) better than they ranked me"
so why do you care about someone's opinion who (according to you) has a flawed understanding of art quality? why would you ever hold their opinion in such high regard as you currently do?
>"no, their tierlist was accurate, honestly"
so then you're lashing out because you were upset with the truth. perhaps be productive and just try to get better instead of acting on the feminine urge to be passive-aggressive and catty.
>"they didn't even include me"
and? perhaps they were lazy and didn't include multiple people. and even if there was some negative sentiment towards you and your art as the reason they didn't include you, what's the big deal? "oh no, some random person on the internet didn't acknowledge me!" why should they? maybe if your art were better they would have included you. so if you care about them acknowledging you, then perhaps you simply need to get better. perhaps your art is not that interesting to them, so make more interesting art. but if your art goals don't coincide with having some rando acknowledge your existence, then move on.

whatever the case is, with all due respect, your behavior is very bitter and shallow and probably even goes against your ultimate goals in art. get thicker skin, my nigger. and here's a sheep, for your troubles.

>> No.7084037 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 98 KB, 1100x619, fun-facts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7084037

>>7083916
>a specific dad who made a tierlist which hurt my ego
okay but were they wrong?
>"yes, I'm (much) better than they ranked me"
so why do you care about someone's opinion who (according to you) has a flawed understanding of art quality? why would you ever hold their opinion in such high regard as you currently are?
"no, their tierlist was accurate, honestly"
so then you're lashing out because you were upset with the truth. perhaps be productive and just try to get better instead of acting on the feminine urge to be passive-aggressive and catty.
>"they didn't even include me"
and? perhaps they were lazy and didn't include multiple people. and even if there was some negative sentiment towards you and your art as the reason they didn't include you, what's the big deal? "oh no, some random person on the internet didn't acknowledge me!" why should they? maybe if your art were better they would have included you. so if you care about them acknowledging you, then perhaps you simply need to get better. perhaps your art is not that interesting to them, so make more interesting art. but if your art goals don't coincide with having some rando acknowledge your existence, then move on.

whatever the case is, with all due respect, your behavior is very bitter and shallow and probably even goes against your ultimate goals in art. get thicker skin, my nigger. and here's a sheep, for your troubles.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]