/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6876111
if you take the harry potter series, then you're just copying the harry potter series.
maybe that's your understanding of what the AI is doing, but that understanding would be wrong.

>>6876115
that is indeed an issue. but do you believe in art or the artist?
i believe only in art. if the work is good, people will respond hopefully.
what you people don't realize is that nobody that is an actual artist wants to make "AI slop".

you think the person who had the sense to paint pic related would make "AI-slop" if they actually tried their hands on AI?
or do you think their artistic sensibilities are actually worth something, which is it? assuming they're not pure prompting.