/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4829046
It's actually a good topic to talk about, if we leave out the dads or any drama.

Both for money and for fun are valid reasons to draw (furry) porn. The whole:
>hurr durr you can't draw furry porn if you're not a furry because you won't enjoy it and furries see right through you that you're just in for the money
Is just furfags being fucking autistic and insecure because they'll give you money if your work is good, but they would absolutely hate themselves for supporting someone who isn't interested in their cause;
>being an absolute fucking degenerate faggot
And even then, you won't draw what you can't enjoy, and by the rule of doing furry porn, doesn't that make you automatically a furry?
>b-b-but no you need to be as autistic and degenerate as the rest of the community or else we won't accept it, you need to own a 5k$ fursuit and draw while having it on or you can't do furry porn
Throughout the years, i've seen and heard it all.
It's like, from the furfags view, everyone wants to do furry porn because money.
Then why isn't every single high skilled artist doing furry porn then?
Simple, because they don't enjoy it and you won't draw what you don't like.
It's mostly just gatekeeping though because the more artists go into furry, the more competition there will be and the prices will start to drop and then there is less money for the big fish.

The whole thing is the same as saying to a porn actress not to get gangbanged for money but solely for her own enjoyment.
Or saying to a male porn actor not to have sex with shemales for money but only if he's gay.
Or saying to a white artist not to draw other ethnicities because they're white.
Or saying to a man that he shouldn't draw idealized women.

Which shows how fucking retarded furries actually are.
People don't hate furries because of stupid reasons like that they like to dress like animals and such, but because of the absolutely unholy faggotry that comes out of their mouth and their community