/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6810782
but this is like the retarded "post your work" mentality.
intellectually you should KNOW whether something can be touched up or not without me having to explicitly show you that i've done it. or just look at the people who do touch their shit up >>6810170

again and again, people here keep coming back to this part. about
>muh skill, muh skill, non artists can't touch me lalala.
meanwhile i'm arguing for the validity of this entire field as a whole.
this is going to be an entirely new field in art, with tons of new approaches and processes, and you retards will just leave the entire discourse on /g/ay?

the there are multiple reasons why i don't touch up anything. it's because the discourse around this is incredibly toxic and retarded. just look at this anon >>6810101 immediately assuming that i didn't do anything, simply because it's AI. second reason is because i'm trying to figure shit out myself. the pieces themselves are really not the point, they're proofs of concept. just for me to see what can be done and what else i could do.

as for the trolling, you're just falling for their bait.
and it's effective because it's partly true. our skill has lost some of its value. that is just a fact. but imo artists still have a giant advantage when using AI art.
and averting your eyes won't change anything...